Our brands work with you to offer end-to-end expert solutions for specific needs throughout the research cycle and beyond.
Suite of AI-powered solutions for publishers
Author support services to help research get published
Medical communication solutions for the life sciences industry
High-engagement content to take research beyond publication
Tools and platforms to simplify the life of researchers
R&D and innovations cell for business solutions
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have been one of the most impressive innovations of the UN in recent years. First introduced in 2015, the 17 SDGs (actually 16, with the 17th being partnerships for the goals) were designed to be an easily comprehensible and assimilable collection of topics, so it is not surprising that publishers and institutions are using them to evaluate their research and to compare their output with other, similar organizations. For example, the THES runs an annual ranking that measures universities’ research output against each of the goals. The Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University in Saudi Arabia was ranked first for SDG5, gender equality, based on a number of criteria, including its research output in this area. How exactly can a university identify the number of publications in one year on gender equality?
Currently, this is estimated using Boolean search carried out on Scopus, the Elsevier-owned A&I collection of abstracts. A lengthy Boolean search (available for examination on Mendeley here) attempts to identify all the relevant articles, by creating a sequence of OR statements containing words and phrases relating to gender equality. Let’s look at the final version used of a Boolean search for SDG 5, “Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls”:
Updated search string (third update): 30,458 document results TITLE-ABS-KEY ( ( {gender inequality} OR {gender equality} OR {employment equity} OR {gender wage gap} OR {female labor force participation} OR {female labour force participation} OR {women labor force participation} OR {women labour force participation} OR {women’s’ employment} OR {female employment} OR {women’s unemployment} OR {female unemployment} OR ( access AND {family planning services} ) OR {forced marriage} OR {child marriage} OR {forced marriages} OR {child marriages} OR {occupational segregation} OR {women’s empowerment} OR {girls’ empowerment} OR {female empowerment} OR {female genital mutilation} OR {female genital cutting} OR {domestic violence} OR {women AND violence} OR {girl* AND violence} OR {sexual violence} OR ( {unpaid work} AND {gender inequality} ) OR ( {unpaid care work} AND {gender inequality} ) OR {women’s political participation} OR {female political participation} OR {female managers} OR {women in leadership} OR {female leadership} OR {intra-household allocation} OR ( access AND {reproductive healthcare} ) OR {honour killing} OR {honor killing} OR {honour killings} OR {honor killings} OR {antiwomen} OR {anti-women} OR {feminism} OR {misogyny} OR {female infanticide} OR {female infanticides} OR {human trafficking} OR {forced prostitution} OR ( equality AND ( {sexual rights} OR {reproductive rights} OR {divorce rights} ) ) OR {women’s rights} OR {gender injustice} OR {gender injustices} OR {gender discrimination} OR {gender disparities} OR {gender gap} OR {female exploitation} OR {household equity} OR {female political participation} OR {women’s underrepresentation} OR {female entrepreneurship} OR {female ownership} OR {women’s economic development} OR {women’s power} OR {gender-responsive budgeting} OR {gender quota} OR ( {foreign aid} AND {women’s empowerment} ) OR {gender segregation} OR {gender-based violence} OR {gender participation} OR {female politician} OR {female leader} OR {contraceptive behaviour} OR {women’s autonomy} OR {agrarian feminism} OR {microfinance} OR {women’s livelihood} OR {women’s ownership} OR {female smallholder} OR {gender mainstreaming} ) ) AND PUBYEAR < 2018 AND PUBYEAR > 2012
There are around 85 search terms included here. A search of this kind has many limitations:
Is there a better way of achieving the result? The UNSILO concept extraction tool, as used by the OECD to tag all their content to the SDG goals, provides, we believe, a much more precise way of selecting content:
It would be an interesting exercise to compare what is found, and what missed, by the two approaches. In the meantime, the results of using UNSILO for SDGs can be seen on the dedicated OECD website, and on the Taylor and Francis SDG website.